It seems that the age of Blair. Over in Britain, Tony Blair at 10 Downing Street and Sir Ian Blair, Metropolitan Police Commissioner. Here in Toronto, our Chief of Police Bill is ... Yes, you guessed it ... Blair.
The age of Blair at altitudes has seen an increase in surveillance and control of the police. Some on the left side in the UK are also with the term "police state". I do not think we have reached this point yet, but we seem to progress in this direction withSpeed of a freight train on the loose.
Speaking of Blair - the latest innovation will be added to the ubiquitous microphones, surveillance cameras in the UK at full volume to "apply in humans, as bad. This extension is very demanding audio. The equipment can detect, for example, the tone Voice aggressive compared to the level and rate of speech decibels. In other words, if you do a pilot who is about to expire is finished, you can scream your voice pattern,rather than the driver, a source of interest. If the control room operators recognize that they call criminal behavior ... omitted the arguments for and challenging as well ... It is likely that the culprits will be barked warnings on them from above.
There are around 4.2 million CCTV cameras in Britain. And 'the surveillance society in the Western world. In addition to these physical interventions, we are all to an increase in all sectors of so-called "dataveillance --Mobile phones, credit cards, GPS tracking, cell-site data, info push, login / logout records - to name but a few of the ways in which to collect the data.
The interface between the authorities and civil society is increasingly polarized. This happens even in a British company which has long defended the rights of individuals, including the right to privacy. Act of public policy in the United Kingdom was used to restrict freedom of expression and activities that previouslyamounts to the simple exercise of our democratic right to protest, too. Provisions slipped SOCPA - The Serious Organized Crime and Police Act - making the indulgence in off-color humor in public is a potentially hazardous.
The terrorist threat is used as a pretext for much of this. Given the disaster that is present day Iraq, it seems quite clear that elements of the Blair government is trying to hype the terror concerns at home as a way to deflect attention from foreign policy initiatives thatincreasingly seen as a disaster.
I am not suggesting that the terrorist threat is not a cause for concern, or that a reasonable level of preparation is not adequate. But I believe that freedom is useless for people with political motivations that led to false in an effort to look too good, instead of a balanced solution for the safety issues involved in dangerous situations.
I am pretty sure that the majority of Britons have no desire to be pawns in a gamePremise that most of them in the first place.
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น